Agentic AI for Financial Crime Compliance

Solytics Partners deploys governed agents across the entire financial-crime lifecycle — due diligence, screening, monitoring, investigation and regulatory risk — with human oversight, runtime policy controls and evidence embedded in every action.

Governed

Every agent registered, risk-tiered and approved before it acts.

Validated

Every plan, tool call and output validated in flight.

Assured

Step-level evidence produced as the work happens.

POLICY & RULES FCC AGENTS IN ACTION GOVERNED AGENT ORCHESTRATION CDD / EDD AGENT Onboarding & review SCREENING AGENT Sanctions | PEP | Media MONITORING AGENT Transaction monitoring INVESTIGATION AGENT Casework & reporting REGULATORY RISK AGENT Obligation change HUMAN REVIEW VERIFIED COMPLIANCE OUTCOME RUNTIME ASSURANCE LAYER POLICY | CHECKS EVIDENCE | GOVERNANCE
FCC Agent Portfolio

Specialized agents across the financial crime lifecycle

Purpose-built FCC agents execute critical workflows across onboarding, screening, monitoring, investigations and regulatory risk — operating under shared policy controls, human oversight and continuous evidence capture.

01

CDD / EDD Agent

Onboarding & periodic review
  • CDD / EDD investigation
  • Customer profile generation
  • Diligence report drafting
Primary outcome

Evidence-backed customer due diligence

02

Screening Agent

Sanctions · PEP · Adverse media
  • Deterministic entity matching
  • Alert disposition
Primary outcome

Faster, defensible alert disposition

03

Monitoring Agent

Transaction monitoring
  • Transaction pattern matching
  • Typology & red-flag analysis
  • Alert triage
Primary outcome

Higher-quality risk signals and alerts

04

Investigation Agent

Casework & regulatory reporting
  • Evidence gathering
  • Narrative generation
  • STR / SAR drafting
Primary outcome

Evidence-led investigations and reporting

05

Regulatory Risk Agent

Obligation change & control
  • Regulatory guidance tracking
  • Risk mapping
  • Risk drivers & controls recommendation
Primary outcome

Regulatory change translated into action

Analyst impact

Shift analyst time toward higher-value judgment

Across FCC workflows, analysts spend a significant share of the day on retrieval, screening, evidence gathering and drafting. Governed agents absorb that operational load, so the analyst's time concentrates on assessment, escalation and decision-making.

Typical analyst time today With FCC Agentic Support 20% JUDGMENT 60–70% of operational work EXECUTED BY AGENTS 100% JUDGMENT Retrieval 35% Drafting 23% Screening 22% Judgment 20% Judgment 100% Preparation handled by agents Operational compliance tasks automated by agents, under governance controls
Business impact

Measurable impact across compliance operations

Governed agents improve the economics and effectiveness of compliance work — reducing investigation effort, expanding analyst capacity, improving escalation quality and preserving evidence across every decision.

ALERT TO DISPOSITION MANUAL · FOUR HAND-OFFS GOVERNED RUN TIME REMOVED
60–80% Faster investigations

Reduce the time from alert to analyst-ready disposition through governed agent execution.

CASES CLOSED PER REVIEWER 5–10× MANUAL BASELINE SAME HEADCOUNT
5–10× Greater analyst capacity

Increase case throughput by shifting repeatable review, analysis and drafting work to agents.

ESCALATIONS REACHING AN ANALYST BEFORE WITH GOVERNED AGENTS YIELD GAINED
30–40% Higher-quality escalations

Surface a greater proportion of risk-relevant cases for human review and investigation.

WORKFLOW RUN STEP-LEVEL RECORD ON EVERY ACTION EVIDENCE COVERAGE RUN COMPLETE NO GAPS
100% End-to-end traceability

Maintain a step-level record of agent actions, decisions, evidence and human intervention.

Deployed use cases

Operational proof from live FCC deployments

Examples drawn from production deployments across payments, banking, insurance and financial services. Metrics are presented by workflow and client type to preserve confidentiality.

United Kingdom
Payments Processor
A screening backlog cleared without new headcount

Screening resolution agents disambiguate every hit against name, date and geography — closing the clear cases with rationale recorded, and ranking the rest by exposure.

82%Screening Resolution
of screening hits auto-resolved with recorded rationale
United Arab Emirates
Digital Bank
Enhanced due diligence, measured in minutes

Entity research, ownership resolution and adverse-media checks run on arrival — producing a cited diligence pack the reviewer checks rather than compiles.

11 minCDD / EDD
from onboarding to a cited diligence pack
United States
Tier-1 Bank
Alert triage scaled without proportional analyst effort

Agents assemble the case, score the pattern against known typologies and propose a disposition — analysts review and decide.

68%Alert Triage
less analyst time per alert triage
APAC
Insurer
Filing narratives drafted from the record

A narrative agent assembles history, pattern and evidence into the house template — citing every assertion back to source.

4 minCase Narrative Drafting
from case close to first SAR draft
Governed agent workflows

How Specialized FCC Agents Execute Compliance Tasks

From compliance task to Analyst-ready outcome.

CDD / EDD Agent
What arrives

A higher-risk customer or entity flagged during onboarding or periodic review.

What the agents do
  1. 01Run the CDD / EDD investigation across sources, registry filings and public sources
  2. 02Resolve the ownership chain and generate the customer risk profile
  3. 03Draft the diligence report to your template, every claim cited
What reaches the analyst

A cited diligence pack the reviewer checks rather than compiles.

Analyst Outcome Days reduced to minutes

Timely completion of CDD / EDD reviews.

Nimbus Onboarding · Diligence pack Draft ready
EntityCloudMist Holdings BV
JurisdictionNetherlands
Sources searched31
Ownership chain
CloudMist Holdings BVSubject
Meridian Capital Sarl64% · verified
E. CaldwellUBO · 51% · verified
Findings Two adverse-media items, both historic

Each finding is cited to its source in the pack. No sanctions or PEP exposure identified.

Onboarding ✓  ·  EDD ✓  ·  Customer Risk Assessment ✓
Screening Agent
What arrives

A batch of sanctions, PEP and adverse-media hits from live customer or transaction flow.

What the agents do
  1. 01Review the match criteria against the customer record on deterministic criteria
  2. 02Dispose of what is demonstrably not a match, scores and rationale recorded
  3. 03Generate a recommended action with all the accumulated evidence
What reaches the analyst

A short, ordered queue — and a defensible record for every closure.

Analyst Outcome False positive reduction

Consistent disposition across analysts, shifts and jurisdictions.

Nimbus Hit SCR-2026-1184 · Sanctions Disposed
SubjectAhmed Hassan
ListOFAC SDN
Match score91.4
Identifier comparison
FieldBasisResult
NameFuzzy variance within thresholdPartial
Date of birthJul 1978 · month and year alignMatch
NationalityEgyptian · consistentMatch
AddressMiddle East region indicatorsPartial
Conclusion True positive · four corroborating identifiers

Name variance sits within accepted fuzzy thresholds. Date of birth and nationality align to the listed individual.

Recommendation

Prioritise for immediate compliance action. Escalate to sanctions officer.

Match criteria ✓ · Rationale recorded ✓ · Disposition ✓
Integrated Monitoring Agent
What arrives

An alert for transaction activity on a customer, counterparty or corridor under monitoring.

What the agents do
  1. 01Match the transaction pattern against the customer’s expected behaviour
  2. 02Map it against the institution’s typology and red-flag library
  3. 03Triage the alert using scores derived from ML algorithms and propose a disposition, with the reasoning attached
What reaches the analyst

A triaged alert — cleared, or escalated with the typology already named.

Analyst Outcome 60–80% less time per alert

Triage capacity decoupled from alert volume.

Nimbus Case CS-2026-044 · Transaction alert Agent complete
CustomerNorthbridge Transit LLC
CorridorUS → UAE
Window7 days
Immediate investigation required · SAR assessment warranted

Three model-flagged typologies confirmed against the institution’s red-flag library.

Risk score 82.60 Escalate to senior AML officer
Confirmed typologies
Large inbound wires · $30MHigh
One-to-many disbursement · 7 daysHigh
High-risk jurisdiction transferMedium
Case tags
Transaction velocity spikeRapid movement of funds One-to-many disbursementMulti-jurisdiction wire
Proposed disposition Escalate for SAR assessment

Reasoning, matched typologies and the supporting transactions are attached for the analyst to review rather than reconstruct.

Pattern match ✓ · Typology detection ✓ · Triage ✓
Investigation Agent
What arrives

Alerts or cases created by transaction monitoring or other systems.

What the agents do
  1. 01Gather the evidence and reconstruct the activity behind the case
  2. 02Generate the narrative and draft to the institution’s filing template
  3. 03Cite every assertion in the STR / SAR back to the underlying record
What reaches the analyst

An evidenced case file and a filing draft the MLRO reviews instead of writes.

Analyst Outcome Every claim traced to source

A filing defensible line by line, on demand.

Nimbus Case 4471 · SAR narrative For MLRO review
Suspicious activity report · draft

Between March and July, the subject received 17 inbound transfers from unrelated third parties, each below the reporting threshold.1

Funds were consolidated within 48 hours and forwarded to a single overseas beneficiary with no documented commercial relationship.2

Evidence assembled
SourceItemsCited
Transaction records412 entriesAll
KYC & onboarding file9 documentsAll
Prior alerts & cases3 linkedAll
Conclusion Layering pattern consistent with typology library

37 citations attached. Every assertion resolves to the underlying record.

Evidence gathered ✓ · Narrative drafted ✓ · Citations bound ✓
Regulatory Analysis Agent
What arrives

A change in regulatory guidance affecting the financial-crime programme.

What the agents do
  1. 01Track the guidance and identify what has actually changed
  2. 02Map the obligation to the risk assessment, including inherent and control risk drivers
  3. 03Surface the risk drivers and recommend the control evaluation
What reaches the analyst

A mapped impact assessment showing what to change, and where.

Analyst Outcome Change tracked to control

Obligations mapped continuously, not reconstructed at audit.

Nimbus Guidance update · Impact assessment Mapped
SourceFATF · Rec. 15
Programme areaCustomer due diligence
Controls touched14
Obligation mapped to controls
ControlRisk driverStatus
CDD refresh cadencePeriodic review gapAligned
Source-of-wealth evidenceEvidence sufficiencyUpdate
Beneficial-owner thresholdOwnership opacityUpdate
Recommended Two controls require amendment

Each recommendation cites the clause it derives from and the process it lands on.

Regulatory Intelligence ✓  ·  Policy Mapping ✓  ·  Impact Assessment ✓
Why Solytics Partners

Built on expertise. Engineered for regulated environments.

Team of Experts

Built by FCC practitioners

Shaped by practitioners who know how financial-crime programmes operate — informing workflows, controls and decision logic on the platform.

Prebuilt assurance layer

Prebuilt assurance layer

Policy enforcement, agent controls, monitoring and evidence capture sit together as a prebuilt governance foundation across agent workflows.

Operating model

Tailored solutions for your operating model

We configure workflows, controls and deployment to each institution’s jurisdiction, policy, risk appetite and control environment.

Review & audit

Regulatory alignment built in

Regulatory expectations guide design through deployment, with evidence captured for oversight, audit and examination.

Background Gradient

Scale FCC workflows with runtime assurance built in

Governed from the outset
Get complete visibility across models, GenAI applications and autonomous agents — one inventory, one risk tier, one lifecycle.
Controlled during execution
Policy checks, permissions and escalation paths govern what an agent can do and when human intervention is required.
Evidence retained throughout
Actions, rationale and supporting evidence are captured across the workflow for review, audit and regulatory examination.
Download the FCC agent brochure
Talk to an expert
*We will use your personal data to only send you relevant emails, which you can opt-out of at any time. By signing up, you agree to our Terms Of Service and Privacy Policy.
Thank you!
Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.